<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:isc="http://dtd.interspire.com/rss/isc-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The Servant People Store: Latest News]]></title>
		<link>https://www.migrations.info</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest news from The Servant People Store.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<isc:store_title><![CDATA[The Servant People Store]]></isc:store_title>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chart Distinction of Israel & Judah]]></title>
			<link>https://www.migrations.info/chart-distinction-of-israel-judah/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.migrations.info/chart-distinction-of-israel-judah/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Israel (Joseph-Ephraim) received the birthright, not Judah (1 Chronicles 5:1-2). The Two Houses are separate peoples with separate promises (Genesis 49; Deuteronomy 33) even in the end-time (Revelation 7). This separation went back to Genesis 38:1, continued in the time of Moses and the Exodus (Psalm 114:1-2), continuing until their rejoining by faith in David’s Greater Son, the Messiah, at the end of age (Ezekiel 37:22-25). The Old Testament distinguishes them, most notably in the Books of Kings and Chronicles & New Testament, Matthew 10:6; 15:24.  www.migrations.info</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel (Joseph-Ephraim) received the birthright, not Judah (1 Chronicles 5:1-2). The Two Houses are separate peoples with separate promises (Genesis 49; Deuteronomy 33) even in the end-time (Revelation 7). This separation went back to Genesis 38:1, continued in the time of Moses and the Exodus (Psalm 114:1-2), continuing until their rejoining by faith in David’s Greater Son, the Messiah, at the end of age (Ezekiel 37:22-25). The Old Testament distinguishes them, most notably in the Books of Kings and Chronicles & New Testament, Matthew 10:6; 15:24.  www.migrations.info</p>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scots-Irish-Welsh DNA proves Israelite descent]]></title>
			<link>https://www.migrations.info/the-biblical-dna-of-the-british-isles/scotsirishwelsh-dna-proves-israelite-descent/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.migrations.info/the-biblical-dna-of-the-british-isles/scotsirishwelsh-dna-proves-israelite-descent/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">For years critics have claimed that “DNA
disproves a British-Israel ethnic connection.” No evidence is ever supplied by
these detractors, and in fact the opposite is actually true: DNA has now proven
that the peoples of the British Isles have a genetic link to the Mideast and
Hebrew-Phoenician early colonists. An article published in December, 2020, by
the website <em style="background-color: initial; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif; color: rgb(52, 49, 63);">Irish Central</em> is headlined,
“Ancient bones reveal Irish are not Celts
after all.” A chance discovery of ancient bones under an Irish pub in 2006 has
now revealed important DNA evidence of Irish origins.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The article says, “In 2006, Bertie Currie was clearing land to make a driveway for
McCuaig's Bar on Rathlin Island off Antrim when he noticed a large, flat stone
buried beneath the surface.” Currie dug beneath the stone and found an open
cavity. "I shot the torch in and saw the gentleman, well, his skull and
bones,” Currie said. Three skeletons were found from an ancient burial that
have now been identified by DNA analysis as the ancestors of modern Irish,
Welsh, and Scottish people. The bones far predate the arrival of the Celts from
the European mainland, and match early Mid-Eastern DNA from Palestine.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">For many years, it was believed that the early inhabitants of
the British Isles were “autochthonous,” with ancestors dating back hundreds of
thousands of years to the end of the last Ice Age. Others assume that the Irish
people are descended from Celtic tribes from mainland Europe. This new DNA
evidence reveals that, “Instead <strong>Irish
ancestors may have come to Ireland from the Bible lands in the Middle East</strong>.
They might have arrived in Ireland from the Mediterranean and would have
brought cattle, cereal, and ceramics with them,” according to the <em>Irish Central</em> report. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The Proceedings of the American
National Academy of Science (PNAS) also investigated the find and reported in
2015 that the bones “strikingly resembled those of contemporary Irish,
Scottish, and Welsh people.” A retired archaeology professor at the
highly-renowned University of Oxford said that the discovery could completely
change the perception of Irish ancestry.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Such a revelation
should not be a complete surprise. Historians for many years documented the
early settlement of the British Isles by “Phoenician” traders and colonists. Scholars
know that the Phoenician language is virtually identical to Hebrew, and the
Bible confirms that Hebrews and Phoenicians sailed together to Western lands.
(1 Kings 9:27; 10:22) Biblical tribes such as Dan, Asher, and Zebulon dwelled
on the Mediterranean seaboard; we are told that “Asher remained on the seacoast, and dwelt by his
landings.” (Judges 5:17) Zebulon’s territory was “a haven for
ships” (Gen. 49:13). The Tuatha de Danaan, widespread early European seafarers
who were famous in Irish prehistory, have been identified by leading scholars
as the Biblical tribe of Dan. Dr. Cyrus Gordon, the foremost American archaeologist
of the 20<sup>th</sup> century, definitely identified the Tuatha de Danaan as
the biblical tribe of Dan. <em>(Before
Columbus</em>, pp. 108-112). Similarly, a leading archaeologist of the 19<sup>th</sup>
century, Dr. Robert G. Latham, also acknowledged the connection, writing, “Neither
do I think that the eponymus of the Argive Danai was other than the biblical
tribe of Dan.” (<em>Ethnology of Europe</em>,
p.136) Scholars have also noted that since the small Phoenician city-states
were dwarfed by ancient Israel and Judah, it is apparent that much of the
Phoenician trade and colonization was in large part Hebrew. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  As far back as the
17<sup>th</sup> century, noted historian Aylett Sammes, in his <em>Antiquities of Ancient Britain</em>,
considered a “Phoenician” origin as certain. He wrote, “The [Irish-Welsh&91;
language itself for the most part, as well as the customs, religion, idols,
offices, dignities, of the ancient Britons, are all clearly Phoenician; as
likewise their instruments of war, as slings, and other weapons, their scythed
chariots, and their different names, and several distinctions. Out of the same
tongue I have illustrated several monuments of antiquity found out and still
remaining in Britain, which can in no ways be interpreted than in the
Phoenician tongue, where they have a plain, easy, and undeniable
signification.” (Preface, p.4) Many other historians concur with this, such as L.A.
Waddell in his <em>“Phoenician Origin of
Britons Scots and Anglo-Saxons.”</em> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Going back further
into earliest times, the ancient Welsh Triads document three colonies coming
from the continent to the British Isles in some remote age. “And the first is
the Cymry, or Cymbrians; these came over from the German ocean, which they call
Mor Taweh, or the hazy ocean, from the land of Hav, or the summer country, which,
no doubt, was Asia. These came under the command of Hu Gadarn…he conducted the
Cymry to Britain…The second was the Lloegrwys, Loegrians, or Ligurois, who came
from the land of Gwasgwyn, and were sprung from the race of the Cymry. The
third was the Brython, or the Britons, who came from the land of Llydaw,
(Letavia, Armorica, or Bas Bretagne) and were also sprung from the primordial
race of the Cymry.” (<em>Horae Britannicae,</em>
John Hughes, 1819, vol. i. p. 12-14)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  According
to the early Welsh Triads, all three waves of early settlement in the British
Isles involved a people called the “Cymry,” pronounced, “Khumri,” which more
than a millennia later endures as the name given to the Welsh people and also coincidentally
is the exact name that the Assyrians gave the Israelites. (<em>The March of Archaeology</em>, C.W. Ceram, p.216) The name was derived
from Israel’s King Omri, with the lead vowel spoken as a guttural in Semitic.
Omri was at one time famous in the ancient world for having developed an early
law-code, “the statutes of Omri.” (Micah 6:16) Famed early 20th century historian and archaeologist,
Archibald Henry Sayce, in his book, <em>Higher
Critics and the Monuments</em>, adds: “It was, however, in the time of Ahab the
son of Omri that the Assyrians first became acquainted with the northern
kingdom of Israel, and consequently Samaria continued ever afterwards to be
known to them as Beth-Omri, the ‘house of Omri’.” (p. 396)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  The DNA evidence of
a link between early Israel-Phoenicia and the British Isles has previously been
documented in a study by Cambridge University, and published
in the year 2000 in their book, "<em>Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population
Prehistory of Europe.</em>" This scientific study confirms an early
"diffusion spanning the entire European continent from the Levant" or
Mideast. Concerning DNA, we read of "haplogroup H, the most frequent in
Europe and one that is also common in the Near East." In fact, the study
further states that haplogroup H is a primary "signature…type of the
ancient Hebrew population…" It should therefore be no surprise that
"Middle Eastern populations generally connect much closer to typical
northwestern European [DNA&91; samples such as the Irish and Danes." (pp.
109, 165, 175ff)  These new
scientific studies confirm the reason why so many of the Bible prophecies
concerning God’s people Israel have seen their fulfillment in Western European
peoples during the present church age. (For a list of over a hundred fulfilled
prophecies, see: <em>Story of Celto-Saxon
Israel,</em> W.H. Bennett, appendix 1).</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Here is a link to the full
<em>Irish Central</em> news article with the
accompanying photos:&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/ancient-bones-irish-celts"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Irish descent from Israel in the Mideast</span></a> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">For years critics have claimed that “DNA
disproves a British-Israel ethnic connection.” No evidence is ever supplied by
these detractors, and in fact the opposite is actually true: DNA has now proven
that the peoples of the British Isles have a genetic link to the Mideast and
Hebrew-Phoenician early colonists. An article published in December, 2020, by
the website <em style="background-color: initial; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif; color: rgb(52, 49, 63);">Irish Central</em> is headlined,
“Ancient bones reveal Irish are not Celts
after all.” A chance discovery of ancient bones under an Irish pub in 2006 has
now revealed important DNA evidence of Irish origins.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The article says, “In 2006, Bertie Currie was clearing land to make a driveway for
McCuaig's Bar on Rathlin Island off Antrim when he noticed a large, flat stone
buried beneath the surface.” Currie dug beneath the stone and found an open
cavity. "I shot the torch in and saw the gentleman, well, his skull and
bones,” Currie said. Three skeletons were found from an ancient burial that
have now been identified by DNA analysis as the ancestors of modern Irish,
Welsh, and Scottish people. The bones far predate the arrival of the Celts from
the European mainland, and match early Mid-Eastern DNA from Palestine.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">For many years, it was believed that the early inhabitants of
the British Isles were “autochthonous,” with ancestors dating back hundreds of
thousands of years to the end of the last Ice Age. Others assume that the Irish
people are descended from Celtic tribes from mainland Europe. This new DNA
evidence reveals that, “Instead <strong>Irish
ancestors may have come to Ireland from the Bible lands in the Middle East</strong>.
They might have arrived in Ireland from the Mediterranean and would have
brought cattle, cereal, and ceramics with them,” according to the <em>Irish Central</em> report. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The Proceedings of the American
National Academy of Science (PNAS) also investigated the find and reported in
2015 that the bones “strikingly resembled those of contemporary Irish,
Scottish, and Welsh people.” A retired archaeology professor at the
highly-renowned University of Oxford said that the discovery could completely
change the perception of Irish ancestry.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Such a revelation
should not be a complete surprise. Historians for many years documented the
early settlement of the British Isles by “Phoenician” traders and colonists. Scholars
know that the Phoenician language is virtually identical to Hebrew, and the
Bible confirms that Hebrews and Phoenicians sailed together to Western lands.
(1 Kings 9:27; 10:22) Biblical tribes such as Dan, Asher, and Zebulon dwelled
on the Mediterranean seaboard; we are told that “Asher remained on the seacoast, and dwelt by his
landings.” (Judges 5:17) Zebulon’s territory was “a haven for
ships” (Gen. 49:13). The Tuatha de Danaan, widespread early European seafarers
who were famous in Irish prehistory, have been identified by leading scholars
as the Biblical tribe of Dan. Dr. Cyrus Gordon, the foremost American archaeologist
of the 20<sup>th</sup> century, definitely identified the Tuatha de Danaan as
the biblical tribe of Dan. <em>(Before
Columbus</em>, pp. 108-112). Similarly, a leading archaeologist of the 19<sup>th</sup>
century, Dr. Robert G. Latham, also acknowledged the connection, writing, “Neither
do I think that the eponymus of the Argive Danai was other than the biblical
tribe of Dan.” (<em>Ethnology of Europe</em>,
p.136) Scholars have also noted that since the small Phoenician city-states
were dwarfed by ancient Israel and Judah, it is apparent that much of the
Phoenician trade and colonization was in large part Hebrew. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  As far back as the
17<sup>th</sup> century, noted historian Aylett Sammes, in his <em>Antiquities of Ancient Britain</em>,
considered a “Phoenician” origin as certain. He wrote, “The [Irish-Welsh&91;
language itself for the most part, as well as the customs, religion, idols,
offices, dignities, of the ancient Britons, are all clearly Phoenician; as
likewise their instruments of war, as slings, and other weapons, their scythed
chariots, and their different names, and several distinctions. Out of the same
tongue I have illustrated several monuments of antiquity found out and still
remaining in Britain, which can in no ways be interpreted than in the
Phoenician tongue, where they have a plain, easy, and undeniable
signification.” (Preface, p.4) Many other historians concur with this, such as L.A.
Waddell in his <em>“Phoenician Origin of
Britons Scots and Anglo-Saxons.”</em> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Going back further
into earliest times, the ancient Welsh Triads document three colonies coming
from the continent to the British Isles in some remote age. “And the first is
the Cymry, or Cymbrians; these came over from the German ocean, which they call
Mor Taweh, or the hazy ocean, from the land of Hav, or the summer country, which,
no doubt, was Asia. These came under the command of Hu Gadarn…he conducted the
Cymry to Britain…The second was the Lloegrwys, Loegrians, or Ligurois, who came
from the land of Gwasgwyn, and were sprung from the race of the Cymry. The
third was the Brython, or the Britons, who came from the land of Llydaw,
(Letavia, Armorica, or Bas Bretagne) and were also sprung from the primordial
race of the Cymry.” (<em>Horae Britannicae,</em>
John Hughes, 1819, vol. i. p. 12-14)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  According
to the early Welsh Triads, all three waves of early settlement in the British
Isles involved a people called the “Cymry,” pronounced, “Khumri,” which more
than a millennia later endures as the name given to the Welsh people and also coincidentally
is the exact name that the Assyrians gave the Israelites. (<em>The March of Archaeology</em>, C.W. Ceram, p.216) The name was derived
from Israel’s King Omri, with the lead vowel spoken as a guttural in Semitic.
Omri was at one time famous in the ancient world for having developed an early
law-code, “the statutes of Omri.” (Micah 6:16) Famed early 20th century historian and archaeologist,
Archibald Henry Sayce, in his book, <em>Higher
Critics and the Monuments</em>, adds: “It was, however, in the time of Ahab the
son of Omri that the Assyrians first became acquainted with the northern
kingdom of Israel, and consequently Samaria continued ever afterwards to be
known to them as Beth-Omri, the ‘house of Omri’.” (p. 396)</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  The DNA evidence of
a link between early Israel-Phoenicia and the British Isles has previously been
documented in a study by Cambridge University, and published
in the year 2000 in their book, "<em>Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population
Prehistory of Europe.</em>" This scientific study confirms an early
"diffusion spanning the entire European continent from the Levant" or
Mideast. Concerning DNA, we read of "haplogroup H, the most frequent in
Europe and one that is also common in the Near East." In fact, the study
further states that haplogroup H is a primary "signature…type of the
ancient Hebrew population…" It should therefore be no surprise that
"Middle Eastern populations generally connect much closer to typical
northwestern European [DNA&91; samples such as the Irish and Danes." (pp.
109, 165, 175ff)  These new
scientific studies confirm the reason why so many of the Bible prophecies
concerning God’s people Israel have seen their fulfillment in Western European
peoples during the present church age. (For a list of over a hundred fulfilled
prophecies, see: <em>Story of Celto-Saxon
Israel,</em> W.H. Bennett, appendix 1).</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">  Here is a link to the full
<em>Irish Central</em> news article with the
accompanying photos:&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/ancient-bones-irish-celts"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Irish descent from Israel in the Mideast</span></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
